Where unused credits go on invideo AI
invideo AI gives this column a single sentence saying credits do not roll over to the following month. There is no plan-by-plan variation and no grace period, which makes the allowance a use-it-or-lose-it quantity. As of 2026-09-22.
| Point | What the pricing page states |
|---|---|
| The statement | Unused credits do not roll over to the next month |
| Length of the answer | One sentence, on the page carrying the plan prices |
| Plan-by-plan variation | Absent: the sentence covers every plan |
| Credits bought outside a plan | Absent from the page |
Inclusion rule. Sentences on the pricing page bearing on unspent credits. The page has one, and it is quoted in full rather than summarised. Order. The statement first, then what it leaves out.
1Where invideo AI sits in this column
| Channel | Unused credits |
|---|---|
| Hedra | No answer, though the FAQ asks |
| HeyGen | Answered by billing cycle |
| invideo AI | A single sentence, and it is a refusal |
| Kling AI | A 180-day window, stated twice |
| Magnific | A year, with no monthly reset |
| Morph Studio | No answer on the page that asks |
| Pika | A feature bullet, not a rule |
| Runway | Three answers, one per plan |
| SceneMixer | Into one balance, with no lapse date |
| Synthesia | Not stated where the plans are priced |
Inclusion rule. Channels whose own priced pages say something about credits left unspent, including the ones that raise the question and leave it unanswered. A channel that never meters in credits has nothing to answer and is not listed. Order. Alphabetical by channel name.
2A one-sentence answer is worth more than it looks
This column is mostly filled with hedges, cycles and exceptions. A flat statement that the allowance does not survive the month is the easiest version of this fact to plan against: the effective cost of a month is the plan price, whatever fraction of the allowance was used.
That also makes the seller's incentive legible. An allowance that expires rewards steady monthly output and punishes bursts, and a production working in bursts is paying for months it barely used. Nothing else needs to be worked out.
3What the sentence does not cover
It says nothing about credits acquired outside a plan, which on other channels is the half that behaves differently. If no such purchase exists here, the omission is correct; if one does, the answer for it is missing from the page that prices it.
It also says nothing about what an exhausted allowance does mid-month. Stopping, queueing and charging on are three very different outcomes for a delivery date, and the pricing page treats the boundary as a quantity rather than an event.
4Why this entry sits outside the ledger
invideo AI is recorded here as a channel without a computable rate, because the credits it meters in are quoted per video rather than per second and no credit price appears. This column is the part of its pricing that is fully published, which is why it has an entry at all.
Read together, the two facts describe a monthly product rather than a metered one. For a buyer that is a legitimate shape; it just cannot be compared against a figure in dollars per second without inventing the missing half.
- Unused creditsUnused credits do not roll over to the next monthone sentence
- What invideo AI publishes instead of a rateMonthly credit allowances, with credits quoted per video
5Sources
Read from the pricing page published at invideo.io on 2026-09-22. The rate this column sits beside is on invideo AI; what the register accepts as published is on the method page. The same column on other channels: Pika, SceneMixer. Every column: what each channel publishes.