Which channels publish both halves of a credit rate
A credit figure against a second of output is half a rate. The other half is what a credit costs. Three channels here publish both on pages anyone can open; four publish one half and one neither, and which half is missing decides how far the page gets. As of 2026-10-25.
| Channel | Credit figure published | Price of a credit |
|---|---|---|
| PixVerse | Five to eighteen credits a second by resolution | 225 credits to the dollar, one reference rate |
| Runway | Twelve credits a second | One cent, on the same page |
| SceneMixer | Ten to thirty-eight credits a second by tier | $0.0149 in the smallest pack, $0.0078 in the largest |
| Hedra | Nothing published against a second | Not stated; the plans divide out at about a cent |
| Luma | Credits per second, by model and resolution | Not stated on the page |
| Magnific | Credits against named seconds at named resolutions | Not stated on the page |
| Pika | Credits by feature, with no duration attached | Not stated on the page |
| Synthesia | Credits stated as minutes of video | Not stated on the page |
Inclusion rule. Channels whose pages meter in credits. Both halves of the conversion are listed, because whether a page closes it is the question. Order. Channels publishing both halves first, then the ones missing one.
1Which half is missing changes how far a page gets
One channel publishes credits per second and no credit price: the difficult half is done and a single sentence is missing. Another publishes plan prices and allowances, so the money divides out and nothing says how much video a credit buys. Those are not the same gap.
A third publishes credit figures attached to features rather than to seconds, which means two halves are missing and guessing either one leaves the other unattached. That channel is furthest from a ledger row despite publishing plenty of numbers.
2Why a plan divided by an allowance is not a credit price
Dividing a subscription by its quota produces a number that is only the price paid if the whole quota gets spent inside whatever window applies. Where the window is unpublished the division gives a floor and reads like a price, and a buyer using half the allowance is paying double it.
That is why the ledger keeps blanks instead of derived figures here. A blank cannot mislead a comparison; a floor carried forward as a rate can, and it carries none of its doubt with it.
3Publishing both halves is a page, not a product change
The three channels that close the conversion did it with one extra sentence each. The credit price is a number the seller sets by fiat and already knows, so its absence is a publishing decision rather than a technical limit.
This is consequently the most movable column in the register. Several channels here are one line away from a rate anyone could recompute, and that line would move them from a section about absence to a row on the ledger.
- Credit priceOne credit costs $0.0149 in the smallest pack and $0.0078 in the largestthe range the conversion rests on
- The credit reference rate; the page lists no packs and no volume tiers225 credits are put at one US dollar
- Published per-second price12 credits per second at $0.01 a credit, which is $0.12 per second
- What Luma publishes instead of a rateCredits per second, with no credit price
- What Pika publishes instead of a rateCredits by feature, with no credit price
- What Hedra publishes instead of a ratePlan prices with a monthly credit allowance, and nothing stating what a credit costs
- What Magnific publishes instead of a rateCredits against named durations of video, with no price for a credit
- What Synthesia publishes instead of a rateCredits with a stated equivalence in minutes of video, and no price for a credit
4Sources
Each figure is read from the vendor page linked in the ledger, checked 2026-10-25. How a figure qualifies is on method; what a rate leaves out is on limits and unspent credits and parallel generations. Nearby: Strings attached, Reseller or source, Asked, not answered.