RenderDrama

What a second of AI video costs, channel by channel

What Pika publishes about price

Pika (pika.art) publishes plan prices with a monthly credit allowance, and credit costs attached to features rather than to seconds. Neither a credit price nor a duration is stated, so there are two missing halves rather than one. As of 2026-09-12.

The two separate gaps between the Pika plans page and a per-second rateTwo inputs would be needed to reach a rate and neither is published. The price of a credit is absent, and the credit costs that are published attach to features rather than to seconds, so no duration is stated either. Most unpriced rows are missing one half; this one is missing both.Credit priceNot publishedNothing to multiply byNo money per creditDurationNot publishedCosts attach to featuresNo seconds to divide byA price per secondBoth halves absent, not one
Fig. 1 Where other pages leave one number out, this one leaves out both sides of the division. That is a different kind of silence, not a deeper one.
What is and is not on Pika's own pricing pages, read on 2026-09-12.
ItemOn the page
Plan pricesPublished
Monthly credit allowance per planPublished
Credits per featurePublished
Credits per secondNot published
A price per creditNot published

Inclusion rule. Items a per-second rate would need, plus what the vendor publishes instead. Items no vendor in this field publishes are not listed. Order. Published items first, then the missing ones.

1Feature pricing and duration pricing answer different questions

A figure attached to a feature says what an action costs. A figure attached to a second says what output costs. A production planning a season needs the second one, because the quantity it is buying is runtime.

Converting between them needs to know how much output one use of the feature returns, and that is not on the pricing page. Two missing numbers do not combine into an estimate; they compound.

The Pika pricing page as it appeared on 16 September 2026.
Fig. 2 Credit costs attached to features rather than to seconds, which is the second of the two halves missing here.Screenshot of pika.art/pricing, captured 2026-09-16. Reproduced to show where this entry was read from.

2Where feature pricing is the more honest shape

For work that is genuinely per-action rather than per-minute, pricing by feature describes the product better than a rate would. A tool used to alter existing footage is bought by the operation, and a per-second figure would be the awkward fit.

That is worth saying because the absence of a rate here is not necessarily a gap in disclosure. It can be a product that is not sold by the second, and this register records the shape rather than grading it.

3What would put this on the ledger

Credits stated per second of output, and a price per credit. Either alone leaves the conversion resting on an assumption, which is the line this ledger does not cross.

4The production behind the price

Price aside, what goes into the seconds behind “Pika” is described in SceneMixer's guides:

A serialized vertical-video show (typically 60–120 seconds per episode, 9:16) where the cast, scenes, and footage are AI-generated.

SceneMixer, The AI Micro Drama Production Pipeline — “What is an AI micro drama?” (read 2026-10-13)

The shot seconds in the storyboard add up to the segment length, so editing them changes it.

SceneMixer, Fixing One Shot Without Redoing Everything — “Can I change the duration of a segment?” (read 2026-10-13)

5Sources

Read from pika.art, checked 2026-09-12. What this register accepts as a published rate is on the method page; the channels that do publish one are on the ledger. What Pika publishes in the other columns: unused credits, price of a credit. Also without a published rate: Morph Studio, invideo AI.

  • What Pika publishes instead of a rate
    Credits by feature, with no credit pricePika, pricing page / recorded 2026-09-12